Skip to content

Robots won't replace us because we still need 'that human touch'

So says Australia's Chief Scientist Alan Finkel in a new piece for The Conversation.

Seamus Byrne
Seamus Byrne
1 min read
Robots won't replace us because we still need 'that human touch'

So says Australia's Chief Scientist Alan Finkel in a new piece for The Conversation.

This brings us back to an important focus area for parents and young folks trying to pin down a smart career path that won't be eaten up by machines in the coming 30 years. What are the tasks that really need a human touch?

But automation hasn’t killed the artisan bakery. Online courses haven’t killed the bricks-and-mortar university. FitBit hasn’t killed the personal trainer. On the contrary, they’re all booming, alongside their machine equivalents.

Some good perspectives on the concepts that make a job 'human', or attractive to human customers, not just general thematic or industry discussions.

[Image courtesy of Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-ND]

TechnologyIdeas

Seamus Byrne Twitter

Founder and Head of Content at Byteside.


Related Posts

Members Public

Building a 21st Century knowledge engine

ChatGPT reveals the potential for a Knowledge Engine that can speed up our ability to learn.

Building a 21st Century knowledge engine
Members Public

Welcome to Dragon Talk: D&D's Shelly Mazzanoble & Greg Tito visit Byteside

We're talking to the co-hosts of the official Dungeons & Dragons podcast about their new book looking back at how the show came to mean so much to the D&D community.

Part of the bright red book cover art, saying "Welcome to Dragon Talk: Inspiring Conversations About"
Members Public

The future of trust and security

Sponsored by IBM. Trust and security have been a big challenge throughout the pandemic, but the events of 2022 have tested these ideas like never before.

The future of trust and security